As millions of Americans processed the news that a terror
attack had left 50 people dead at a gay nightclub in Orlando, Donald Trump
reignited a political debate.
Though investigators had yet to officially conclude that the
Orlando assailant was inspired by radical Islamic ideology, Sunday's tragedy
returns questions over the importance of such terminology to the center of
American politics.
Here's a look at why "radical Islam" and
"radical Islamic terrorism" are such loaded terms and the arguments
for and against using them.
Why do Donald Trump and other Republicans say using the term
"radical Islamic terrorism" is so important?
Trump and other Republicans have hewed the same line: If you
don't name your enemy, you can't to defeat it.
Trump explained his outrage at Obama's refusal to use the
term at a campaign rally this spring: "Unless you're going to talk about
it, you're not going to solve the damn problem folks. You're not going to solve
it."
Trump and other Republicans have argued that the Obama
administration fails to understand the enemy -- a key component of which, they
argue, is the radical Islamic ideology that is fueling terrorist attacks in the
Middle East and increasingly in the West.
Terrorists who perpetrated the most recent attacks in Europe
and the U.S. -- like the shootings in San Bernardino, California, and Paris --
all subscribed to radical Islamic ideologies. The White House, Republicans say,
shouldn't be afraid to call out the source of this violence.
No comments:
Post a Comment