Nigerian President Muhummadu Buhari writes of building an
economic bridge to Nigeria’s future (“The Three Changes Nigeria Needs,” op-ed,
June 14). It’s hard to see how his administration’s inflexibility, lack of
vision and reactive approach will achieve this.
It’s hard to see how
President Buhari’s policies are good for Nigeria’s future. As for Mr. Buhari’s ideas to rebalance the economy and
regenerate growth, his damaging and outdated monetary policy has been
crippling. The manufacturing sector, essential to Nigeria’s diversification,
has been hardest hit, exacerbating an already fast-growing employment crisis.
Foreign investors have started to flee en masse.
Mr. Buhari makes only brief mention of the country’s
deteriorating security situation. But security and stability are precursors to
economic growth and development. Boko Haram has been pushed back for now, but
little attention is paid to the structural issues that have spurred its rise.
Instead, the Nigerian government has diverted much-needed
military resources to the Niger Delta, where rising militancy has reduced
Nigeria’s oil production to less than half the country’s capacity, and half the
amount required to service the national budget. Much of these tensions arise
from Mr. Buhari’s decision to cut amnesty payments to militants and an
excessively hard-line approach in a socially and politically sensitive
environment.
Other ethnic tensions are also growing. In the country’s
south, protests have been met by a bloody response from the Nigerian military,
stoking the fire and galvanizing support for an independent state of Biafra.
Rising tensions could again pose one of the greatest threats to Nigeria’s stability
and future.
Pete Hoekstra
Senior Fellow
The Investigative Project on Terrorism
Washington
Mr. Hoekstra was the former chairman of the U.S. House
Intelligence Committee from 2004 to 2007.
No comments:
Post a Comment